Derive the open Toda equations
How do exponential interactions produce the Toda equations? Starting with a finite open chain, you will derive every force, check the two ends, and convert the result into the variables used by a Lax matrix. The three-particle calculation is small enough to do by hand, but it exposes the signs and boundary terms needed for any finite chain.
Required background. Differentiate functions of several variables while holding the other variables fixed. The entry check and repair supplies the Hamiltonian rule used here.
Helpful background. The differential-equation bridge explains first-order systems and initial data. The course introduction explains how this calculation leads to a test of integrability. The Toda model fixes the system throughout the sequence.
Forces in the open Toda chain
Section titled “Forces in the open Toda chain”Take a fixed integer , real coordinates , and real canonical momenta , with . All quantities and time are dimensionless; the masses and exponential coupling have been scaled to one. There is no constraint ordering the . The Hamiltonian is
“Open” means that the interaction sum stops at the bond between sites and . There is no bond joining to , and neither endpoint is held fixed. This is the finite nonperiodic system in Moser 1975, § 1, p. 467, equations (1.1)–(1.3), PDF.
Use the canonical bracket
For a function without explicit time dependence, . In particular,
The task is to compute these derivatives, rather than guess a force from the appearance of the exponential.
Entry check and repair
Section titled “Entry check and repair”
For , find and . Then use the bracket definition to find and . Try this before reading the repair.
Repair. The chain rule gives and . Also and , so only one term survives in : it is . Reversing the roles of and gives . The minus sign belongs to Hamilton’s equation as well as to any derivative of a negative exponent.
As a quick retry, the Hamiltonian gives and .
Differentiate the three-particle Hamiltonian
Section titled “Differentiate the three-particle Hamiltonian”For , introduce the positive bond strengths
The middle coordinate occurs in two bonds, with opposite signs:
The end coordinates occur in only one bond each. Thus the complete equations are
Each bond pushes its two particles in opposite directions. Consequently the total momentum obeys
This cancellation detects an unbalanced extra force, but it does not determine the boundary condition. An erroneous closing bond would add to and to , leaving . Verify each endpoint equation against the open Hamiltonian as well as checking total momentum.
For general , write for the actual bonds , and set the missing-bond symbols . Then
The values do not introduce extra finite coordinates or .
Exponential coordinates and a worked check
Section titled “Exponential coordinates and a worked check”Define
The chain rule, including its factor of one half, gives
These variables encode the momenta and coordinate differences. They do not retain the common displacement of all particles, and they are not new canonical coordinate–momentum pairs.
For the initial state used throughout the course,
we have and . Therefore
There is a useful independent energy check. The kinetic energy derivative is , while
The two contributions cancel. The particles can have nonzero accelerations while their total energy stays constant.
Exercises
Section titled “Exercises”
Guided practice: the missing endpoint terms
Section titled “Guided practice: the missing endpoint terms”For an interior site, complete
Use the answers to derive . Write the two endpoint equations separately, then show by telescoping that . Explain why this is consistent with invariance under for a constant .
Independent practice: unequal bonds
Section titled “Independent practice: unequal bonds”At one instant take
Compute , , , , , and . Verify directly that the kinetic and potential energy derivatives cancel at that instant. This state tests both a nonzero middle force and unequal bond strengths.
Changed setting: add a pinning potential
Section titled “Changed setting: add a pinning potential”For , replace by
Keep the canonical bracket. Derive the new equations for , , and . Is still conserved for all initial states? Is the original conserved? Identify the energy that is conserved, and state which symmetry has changed. Do not infer whether the modified system is integrable from this calculation alone.
Endpoint terms. has coefficient in the exponent of and in that of . In the sum of forces, each actual bond appears twice.
Unequal bonds. First compute and ; their square roots, rather than their values, are the . For the energy check, use and .
Pinning. Differentiate the added term with respect to each . Its derivative with respect to is zero. Check the two energy derivatives separately before combining them.
Solutions and checks
Section titled “Solutions and checks”
Endpoint terms
Section titled “Endpoint terms”The derivatives are and , so the additional minus sign in Hamilton’s equation gives . At the left end, ; at the right end, . Thus
A common translation changes no difference , so it changes neither the potential nor . Equivalently, differentiating with respect to gives , exactly the identity used in .
Unequal bonds
Section titled “Unequal bonds”Substitution gives
The middle force is . The kinetic energy derivative is . The potential energy derivative is . Their sum is zero, as is the total force .
Pinning
Section titled “Pinning”The new equations are
The equation for retains its form because does. However,
Neither quantity is conserved for arbitrary initial data. The added potential has derivative , so . Pinning singles out an origin and removes common-translation invariance. A derivative that happens to vanish at one instant is not a conservation law valid along every trajectory.
Check your understanding
Section titled “Check your understanding”You are ready to build the Lax pair when you can recover the endpoint signs and the factor of one half in without looking them up. Keep these distinctions clear:
- Open endpoints remove bonds; they do not fix endpoint positions.
- is the bond strength, while is its positive square root.
- Deriving equations and checking energy does not yet establish Liouville integrability.